Epistemic Entrenchment and the Possible Models Approach

نویسنده

  • Pavlos Peppas
چکیده

The Possible Models Approach (PMA) introduced by Winslett, proposes, among other things, a domain-independent criterion for measuring the similarity between the diierent states of a dynamic system. Based on this criterion of similarity, the PMA makes inferences about the eeects of events in the system. The concept of similarity between states (possible worlds) appears also in the area of Belief Revision in the form of a system of spheres. Systems of spheres are in turn connected to epistemic entrenchments by means of the AGM revision functions that the two structures induce. In view of these connections, in this article we identify and study the properties of the family of epistemic entrench-ments corresponding to systems of spheres that comply with PMA's criterion of similarity. Using the results established herein, we then outline a version of the PMA based on epistemic entrenchments.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Coherent Choice and Epistemic Entrechment (Preliminary Report)

1 I n t r o d u c t i o n The notion of the epistemic entrenchment has recently at t racted quite some attention in the AI community. It was introduced, first under the name "epistemic importance", by Peter G~irdenfors [7, 8]. He specified two possible "origins" of epistemic entrenchment: an information-theoretic appoach and a paradigm approach. However, neither of these approaches squares well...

متن کامل

Entrenchment of Knowledge Types 1 On the epistemic entrenchment of different types of knowledge expressed as conditionals in belief revision tasks

On the epistemic entrenchment of different types of knowledge expressed as conditionals in belief revision tasks Renée Elio Abstract Some belief revision theories appeal to the notion of epistemic entrenchment as a guide to choosing among alternative ways of removing inconsistency that new information may cause with existing beliefs. While belief revision theorists may not be interested in natu...

متن کامل

Transmutations of Knowledge Systems

Within the AGM paradigm revision and contraction operators are constrained by a set of rationality postulates. The logical properties of a set of knowledge are not strong enough to uniquely determine a revision or contraction operation, therefore constructions for these operators rely on some form of underlying preference relation, such as a systems of spheres, or an epistemic entrenchment orde...

متن کامل

Formal Epistemology: An Introduction to Belief Revision, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, and Conditionals

I. AGM Belief Revision Theory 1) The Elements of Epistemological Theories: Ch. 1 of [4]. 2) Models of Epistemic States: Ch. 2.1 – 2.5 of [4]. 3) Expansions, Revisions, and Contractions I: Ch. 3.1 – 3.4 of [4]. 4) Expansions, Revisions, and Contractions II: Ch. 3.5 – 3.7 of [4]. 5) Epistemic Entrenchment and Construction of Contraction Functions I: Ch. 4.1 – 4.4. of [4]. 6) Epistemic Entrenchmen...

متن کامل

Basic Entrenchment

In contrast to other prominent models of belief change models based on epistemic entrenchment have up to now been applicable only in the context of very strong packages of requirements for belief revision This paper decomposes the axiomatization of entrenchment into independent modules Among other things it is shown how belief revision satisfying only the basic postulates of Alchourr on G arden...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1995